PAGE 19
Savareen’s Disappearance
by
“Tell me,” he said, addressing the stranger–“What like is this Rantall? Please to tescripe his features.”
“Well,” drawled the person addressed, after a short pause–“there ain’t much to describe about him. He’s a tallish feller–fully four inches taller’n I be. He’s broad and stout–a big man ginerally. Weighs, I should say, not much under a hundred and ninety. Ruther light complected, and has a long cut in his face that shows awful white when he gits his back up. Thunder! he pretty nearly scared me with that gash one night when he was drunk. It seemed to open and shut like a clam-shell, and made him look like a Voodoo priest! You’d think the blood was goan to spurt out by the yard.”
By this time every pair of eyes in the room was staring into the speaker’s face with an expression of bewildered astonishment. Not a man there but recognized the description as a vivid, if somewhat exaggerated portraiture of the long-lost Reginald Bourchier Savareen.
The stranger from Tennessee readily perceived that he had produced a genuine sensation. He gazed from one to another for a full minute without speaking. Then he gave vent to his surcharged feelings by the exclamation: “For the land’s sake!”
An air of speechless bewilderment still pervaded the entire group. They sat silent as statues, without motion, and almost without breath.
Lapierre was the first to recover himself. By a significant gesture he imposed continued silence upon the company, and began to ask questions. He succeeded in eliciting some further pertinent information.
Haskins was unable to say when Randall had acquired a familiarity with the ways and doings of the people residing in the vicinity of the Royal Oak, but it must have been some time ago, as he had lived in the States long enough to have become acquainted with various localities there. As to when and why he had left Canada the stranger was also totally ignorant. He knew, however, that Randall was living in the city of New York about three months ago, as he had seen him there, and had visited him at his lodgings on Amity street in May, when he (Haskins) had attended as a delegate to a sporting convention. At that time Randall had been employed in some capacity in Hitchcock’s sale stable, and made a few dollars now and again by breeding dogs. He lived a needy hand-to-mouth existence, and his poor wife had a hard time of it. His drinking habits prevented him from getting ahead in the world, and he never staid long in one place, but the speaker had no doubt that he might still be heard of at Hitchcock’s by anybody who wanted to hunt him up. “But,” added Mr. Haskins, “I hope I haven’t got him into trouble by coming here to-night. Has he done anything? Anything criminal, I mean?”
After a moment’s deliberation, Lapierre told the whole story. There was no doubt in the mind of any member of the company that Randall and Savareen were “parts of one stupendous whole.” The one important question for consideration was: What use ought to be made of the facts thus strangely brought to light?
By this time supper was announced, and the stranger’s news, exciting as it was, did not prevent the guests from doing ample justice to it. Haskins was loud in his praises of the “spread,” as he termed it. “Jack Randall,” he remarked, “could lie when he had a mind to, but he told the holy truth when he bragged you up as far ahead of the Kentucky cooks. Yes, I don’t mind if I do take another mossel of that frickersee. Dog me if it don’t beat canvas-backs.”
Before the meeting broke up it was agreed on all hands that for the present it would be advisable for the guests to allow the morrow to pass before saying anything to their wives or anyone else about Mr. Haskins’ disclosures. It was further resolved that that gentleman should accompany Lapierre to Millbrook after breakfast in the morning, and that Mrs. Savareen’s father should be made acquainted with the known facts. It was just possible, after all, that Jack Randall might be Jack Randall, and not Savareen, in which case it was desirable to save the lost man’s wife from cruel agitation to no purpose. It would be for her father, after learning all that they knew, to communicate the facts to her or to withhold them, as might seem best to him. On this understanding the company broke up on the stroke of midnight. I am by no means prepared to maintain that their pledges were in all cases kept, and that they each and every one went to sleep without taking their wives into confidence respecting the strange disclosures of the night.