FullReads

Willis’ letters are of a kind always “free and easy.” His “Letters from Under a Bridge” are admirable specimens of letters as they should be; and his “Pencillings by the Way” owe much of their popularity to their easy, familiar, talkative style. The letters of Cicero and Pliny, of ancient, and Swift, Pope, Arbuthnot, Madame de S�vign�, and Lady Mary Wortley Montague, of modern times, are generally received as some of the best specimens extant of epistolary composition. The letters of Charles Lamb are a series of brilliances, though of kaleidoscope variety; they have wit without buffoonery, and seriousness without melancholy. He closes one of them by subscribing himself his friend’s “afflicted, headachey, sorethroaty, humble servant, CHARLES LAMB.”

Some men, and women too, of eminence, have written curiosities in the form of correspondence. The letter of the mother of Foote is a good example of this kind of correspondence. Mrs. Foote became embarrassed, and, being unable to meet a demand, was placed in prison; whereupon she wrote to Mr. Foote as follows:

“DEAR SAM: I am in prison for debt;

come, and assist your loving mother,

E. FOOTE.

It appears that “Sam” was equally entangled in the meshes of the law, for he answered as follows:

“DEAR MOTHER:-So am I; which prevents his duty being

paid to his loving mother by her affectionate son,

“SAM FOOTE.

“P. S.-I have sent my attorney to assist you;
in the mean time, let us hope for better days.”

These laconic epistles are well matched by that of a French lady, who wrote to her husband this missive of intelligence, affection, etc., etc.:

“I write to you because I have nothing to do;

I end my letter because I have nothing to say.”

But these are left far in the rear by the correspondence of two Quakers, the one living in Edinburgh, the other in London. The former, wishing to know whether there was anything new in London, wrote in the corner of a letter-sheet a small interrogation note, and sent it to his friend. In due time he received an answer. He opened the sheet and found, simply, O, signifying that there was none.

In the London Times of January 3d, 1820, is the following, purporting to be a copy of a letter sent to a medical gentleman:

“CER: Yole oblige me uf yole kum un ce me.

I hev a Bad kowld, am Hill in my Bow Hills,

and hev lost my Happy Tight.”

William Cowper, the poet, being on very familiar terms with the Rev. Mr. Newton, amused himself and his friend with a letter, of which the following is a copy:

“MY VERY DEAR FRIEND: I am going to send, what, when you have read, you may scratch your head, and say, I suppose, there’s nobody knows, whether what I have got be verse or not; by the tune and the time, it ought to be rhyme; but if it be, did you ever see, of late or of yore, such a ditty before?

“I have writ Charity, not for popularity, but as well as I could, in hopes to do good; and if the reviewers should say, ‘To be sure the gentleman’s muse wears methodist shoes, you may know by her pace, and talk about grace, that she and her bard have little regard for the taste and fashions, and ruling passions, and hoydening play, of the modern day; and though she assume a borrowed plume, and now and then wear a tittering air, ‘t is only her plan to catch, if she can, the giddy and gay, as they go that way, by a production on a new construction; she has baited her trap, in hopes to snap all that may come, with a sugar-plum.’ His opinion in this will not be amiss; ‘t is what I intend my principal end; and if I succeed, and folks should read, till a few are brought to a serious thought, I shall think I am paid for all I have said, and all I have done, though I have run, many a time, after rhyme, as far as from hence, to the end of my sense, and, by hook or crook, write another book, if I live and am here, another year.