No Napoleonic Chess Player On An Air Cushion
by
ZANGWILL’S IDEA IS FALSE–WHY CHESS PLAYING STUNTS GENIUS
Mr. Zangwill’s keen intellect, straining hard for striking pictures and word effects, sees falsely the great general of the future. He says:
“The Napoleon of the future will be an epileptic chess player, carried about the field of battle on an air cushion.”
In this condensed, picturesque fashion Mr. Zangwill expresses sententiously a number of mistaken ideas. He thinks that the game of war is like the game of chess, and that the future world conqueror will be a great chess player, using men as pawns and the world as his chess-board.
He observes the curious and interesting historical fact that of the world’s great conquerors many, including the two greatest, Napoleon and Alexander, were afflicted with that mysterious disease, epilepsy. He concludes that the great general of the future will probably be a confirmed epileptic.
The ability of a fighting man to-day resides largely, of course, in the brain. The general’s MUSCLES no longer count as a fighting factor. His battles are won or lost inside of his SKULL. Mr. Zangwill concludes that the future great general will have a mind developed to an abnormal extent at the expense of the body–he sees in the future world conqueror an abnormal creature, a giant brain perched on a miserable, wasted body, so feeble and delicate that it must be carried about the field of battle on an air cushion to prevent shocks. —-
The quotation from Zangwill which we print above contains only twenty-one words. Rarely have so many errors, so many fundamental yet plausible errors, been crowded into so little space.
The Napoleon of the future, the great conqueror, will NOT be a chess player. The real Napoleon whom we know had no love for chess or any other waste of time, or any other form of self- indulgence.
Chess is no game for a Napoleon, or for any other man who wants to embody real accomplishment in the story of his life.
CHESS IS A WEAK GAME, FOR IT ADMITS ALL KINDS OF RULES AND ALL KINDS OF FOREORDAINED IMPOSSIBILITIES.
The man who makes the world’s great success will not be bound by rules. The great men of the world are great because they refuse to ADMIT impossibilities.
The man who plays chess has two knights, and these knights he can only send two squares in one direction and one square in another, or one square in one direction and two squares in the other. His two bishops can only move diagonally across the board, one on the white and one on the black. His castles lumber along on straight lines. His king cannot be touched or taken, and the game ends when the king is in fatal danger. The queen, in the dull game we call chess, can do almost anything.
But Napoleon was really a great man, and the game of life that he played was very different from the chess game.
When the king was in hopeless danger, Napoleon’s game had just begun. Others before him had looked upon kings on the board of life as the chess player looks upon the wooden or ivory king before him.
But to Napoleon kings were pawns, to be moved around and made ridiculous. When he felt like it, he made pawns into kings–the descendant of one of his pawn-kings reigns to-day in Sweden.
Napoleon’s game deprived the queen of all power–she was less than a pawn. HIS game sent the bishops hopping back and forth, diagonally or at right angles, as he saw fit. He created knights to his heart’s content, and he taught them to move as he wanted.
Napoleon was great because there was nothing of the chess player about him. He did not admit of regular, foreordained moves on the chess-board or on the board of life. HE REFUSED TO CONSIDER ANYTHING IMPOSSIBLE UNTIL HE HAD TRIED IT. He tells us himself that he deserved credit for crossing the Alps, not that he accomplished a difficult feat, but because he refused to believe those who declared the feat impossible.