FullReads

The world did not interest itself in that phase of Harrietta’s life. Neither did it find fascination in her domestic side. Harrietta did a good deal of tidying and dusting and redding up in her own two-room apartment, so high and bright and spotless. She liked to cook, too, and was expert at it. Not for her those fake pictures of actresses and opera stars in chiffon tea gowns and satin slippers and diamond chains cooking “their favourite dish of spaghetti and creamed mushrooms,” and staring out at you bright-eyed and palpably unable to tell the difference between salt and paprika. Harrietta liked the ticking of a clock in a quiet room; oven smells; concocting new egg dishes; washing out lacy things in warm soapsuds. A throw-back, probably, to her grandmother Scoville.

The worst feature of a person like Harrietta is, as you already have discovered with some impatience, that one goes on and on, talking about her. And the listener at last breaks out with: “This is all very interesting, but I feel as if I know her now. What then?”

Then the thing to do is to go serenely on telling, for example, how the young thing in Harrietta Fuller’s company invariably came up to her at the first rehearsal and said tremulously: “Miss Fuller, I–you won’t mind–I just want to tell you how proud I am to be one of your company. Playing with you. You’ve been my ideal ever since I was a little g–” then, warned by a certain icy mask slipping slowly over the brightness of Harrietta’s features–“ever so long, but I never even hoped—-“

These young things always learned an amazing lot from watching the deft, sure strokes of Harrietta’s craftsmanship. She was kind to them, too. Encouraged them. Never hogged a scene that belonged to them. Never cut their lines. Never patronized them. They usually played ingenue parts, and their big line was that uttered on coming into a room looking for Harrietta. It was: “Ah, there you are!”

How can you really know Harrietta unless you realize the deference with which she was treated in her own little sphere? If the world at large did not acclaim her, there was no lack of appreciation on the part of her fellow workers. They knew artistry when they saw it. Though she had never attained stardom, she still had the distinction that usually comes only to a star back stage. Unless she actually was playing in support of a first-magnitude star, her dressing room was marked “A.” Other members of the company did not drop into her dressing room except by invitation. That room was neat to the point of primness. A square of white coarse sheeting was spread on the floor, under the chair before her dressing table, to gather up dust and powder. It was regularly shaken or changed. There were always flowers–often a single fine rose in a slender vase. On her dressing table, in a corner, you were likely to find three or four volumes–perhaps The Amenities of Book-Collecting; something or other of Max Beerbohm’s; a book of verse (not Amy Lowell’s).

These were not props designed to impress the dramatic critic who might drop in for one of those personal little theatrical calls to be used in next Sunday’s “Chats in the Wings.” They were there because Harrietta liked them and read them between acts. She had a pretty wit of her own. The critics liked to talk with her. Even George Jean Hathem, whose favourite pastime was to mangle the American stage with his pen and hold its bleeding, gaping fragments up for the edification of Budapest, Petrograd, Vienna, London, Berlin, Paris, and Stevens Point, Wis., said that five minutes of Harrietta Fuller’s conversation was worth a lifetime of New York stage dialogue. For that matter I think that Mr. Beerbohm himself would not have found a talk with her altogether dull or profitless.