FullReads

“Well,” said Ewbert, meeting him fully in his humility, “let us try to make it out together. Let us try to think. Apparently, our way has brought us to a dead wall; but I believe there’s light beyond it, if we can only break through. Is it really necessary that we should discover some new principle? Do we know all that love can do from our experience of it here?”

“Have you seen a mother with her child?” Hilbrook retorted.

“Yes, I know. But even that has some alloy of selfishness. Can’t we imagine love in which there is no greed,–for greed, and not hate, is the true antithesis of love which is all giving, while greed is all getting,–a love that is absolutely pure?”

“I can’t,” said the old man. “All the love I ever felt had greed in it; I wanted to keep the thing I loved for myself.”

“Yes, because you were afraid in the midst of your love. It was fear that alloyed it, not greed. And in easily imaginable conditions in which there is no fear of want, or harm, or death, love would be pure; for it is these things that greed itself wants to save us from. You can imagine conditions in which there shall be no fear, in which love casteth out fear?”

“Well,” said Hilbrook provisionally.

Ewbert had not thought of these points himself before, and he was pleased with his discovery, though afterwards he was aware that it was something like an intellectual juggle. “You see,” he temporized, “we have got rid of two of the passions already, fear and greed, which are the potentialities of our unhappiest experience in this life. In fact, we have got rid of three, for without fear and greed men cannot hate.”

“But how can we exist without them?” Hilbrook urged. “Shall we be made up of two passions,–of love and hope alone?”

“Why not?” Ewbert returned, with what he felt a specious brightness.

“Because we should not be complete beings with these two elements alone.”

“Ah, as we know ourselves here, I grant you,” said the minister. “But why should we not be far more simply constituted somewhere else? Have you ever read Isaac Taylor’s Physical Theory of another Life? He argues that the immortal body would be a far less complex mechanism than the mortal body. Why should not the immortal soul be simple, too? In fact, it would necessarily be so, being one with the body. I think I can put my hand on that book, and if I can I must make you take it with you.”

He rose briskly from his chair, and went to the shelves, running his fingers along the books with that subtlety of touch by which the student knows a given book in the dark. He had heard Mrs. Ewbert stirring about in the rooms beyond with an activity in which he divined a menacing impatience; and he would have been glad to get rid of old Hilbrook before her impatience burst in an irruption upon them. Perhaps because of this distraction he could not find the book, but he remained on foot, talking with an implication in his tone that they were both preparing to part, and were now merely finishing off some odds and ends of discourse before they said good-night.

Old Hilbrook did not stir. He was far too sincere a nature, Ewbert saw, to conceive of such inhospitality as a hint for his departure, or he was too deeply interested to be aware of it. The minister was obliged to sit down again, and it was eleven o’clock before Hilbrook rose to go.

X.

Ewbert went out to the gate with the old man, and when he came back to his study, he found his wife there looking strangely tall and monumental in her reproach. “I supposed you were in bed long ago, my dear,” he attempted lightly.

“You don’t mean that you’ve been out in the night air without your hat on!” she returned. “Well, this is too much!” Her long-pent-up impatience broke in tears, and he strove in vain to comfort her with caresses. “Oh, what a fatal day it was when you stirred that wretched old creature up! Why couldn’t you leave him alone!”