PAGE 6
Thomas Arnold
by
There were legends among the younger boys of strange disappearances, and these were attributed to the swift vengeance of “The Bloody Sixth.”
Above the Sixth Form there was no law.
Every scholar took off his hat to a “Sixth.” A Sixth uncovered to nobody, and touched his cap only to a teacher.
And custom had become so rooted that the Sixth Form was regarded as a sort of police necessity–a caste which served the school just as the Army served the Church. To reach the Sixth Form were paradise–it meant liberty and power–liberty to do as you pleased, and power to punish all who questioned your authority.
To uproot the power of the Sixth Form was the intent of a few reformers in pedagogics.
There were two ways to deal with the boys of the Sixth–fight them or educate them.
Arnold called the Rugby Sixth together and assured them that he could not do without their help. He needed them: he wanted to make Rugby a model school, a school that would influence all England–would they help him?
The dogged faces before him showed signs of interest. He continued, without waiting for their reply, to set before them his ideal of an English Gentleman. He persuaded them, melted them by his glowing personality, shook hands with each, and sent them away.
The next day he again met them in the same intimate way, and one of the boys made bold to assure him that if he wanted anybody licked–pupils or teachers–they stood ready to do his bidding.
He thanked the boy, but assured him that he was of the opinion that it would not be necessary to do violence to any one; he was going to unfold to them another way–a new way, which was very old, but which as yet England had not tried.
* * * * *
The great teacher is not the one who imparts the most facts–he is the one who inspires by supplying a nobler ideal.
Men are superior or inferior just in the ratio that they possess certain qualities. Truth, honor, frankness, health, system, industry, kindliness, good-cheer and a spirit of helpfulness are so far beyond any mental acquisition that comparisons are not only odious, but absurd.
Arnold inspired qualities, and in this respect his work at Rugby forms a white milestone on the path of progress in pedagogy.
To an applicant for a position as teacher, Arnold wrote:
What I want is a man who is a Christian and a gentleman, an active man, and one who has commonsense, and understands boys. I do not so much care about scholarship, as he will have immediately under him the lowest forms in the school, but yet, on second thought, I do care about it very much, because his pupils may be in the highest forms; and besides, I think that even the elements are best taught by a man who has a thorough knowledge of the matter. However, if one must give way, I prefer activity of mind and an interest in his work to high scholarship; for the one may be acquired far more easily than the other. I should wish it also to be understood that the new master may be called upon to take boarders in his house, it being my intention for the future to require this of all masters as I see occasion, that so in time the school-barracks may die a natural death. With this to offer, I think I have a right to look rather high for the man whom I fix upon, and it is my great object to get here a society of intelligent, gentlemanly and active men, who may permanently keep up the character of the school, and if I were to break my neck tomorrow, carry it on.