**** ROTATE **** **** ROTATE **** **** ROTATE **** **** ROTATE ****

Find this Story

Print, a form you can hold

Wireless download to your Amazon Kindle

Look for a summary or analysis of this Story.

Enjoy this? Share it!

The Irresistible Ogle
by [?]

“But after SHERIDAN had risen to a commanding position in the gay life of London, he rather disliked to be known as a playwright or a poet, and preferred to be regarded as a statesman and a man of fashion who ‘set the pace’ in all pastimes of the opulent and idle. Yet, whatever he really thought of his own writings, and whether or not he did them, as Stevenson used to say, ‘just for fun,’ the fact remains that he was easily the most distinguished and brilliant dramatist of an age which produced in SHERIDAN’S solemn vagaries one of its most characteristic products.”

Look on this form,–where humor, quaint and sly,
Dimples the cheek, and points the beaming eye;
Where gay invention seems to boast its wiles
In amorous hint, and half-triumphant smiles.

Look on her well–does she seem form’d to teach?
Should you expect to hear this lady preach?
Is gray experience suited to her youth?
Do solemn sentiments become that mouth?

Bid her be grave, those lips should rebel prove
To every theme that slanders mirth or love.

RICHARD BRINSLEY SHERIDAN.–Second Prologue to The Rivals.

The devotion of Mr. Sheridan to the Dean of Winchester’s daughter, Miss Esther Jane Ogle–or “the irresistible Ogle,” as she was toasted at the Kit-cat–was now a circumstance to be assumed in the polite world of London. As a result, when the parliamentarian followed her into Scotland, in the spring of 1795, people only shrugged.

“Because it proves that misery loves company,” was Mr. Fox’s observation at Wattier’s, hard upon two in the morning. “Poor Sherry, as an inconsolable widower, must naturally have some one to share his grief. He perfectly comprehends that no one will lament the death of his wife more fervently than her successor.”

In London Mr. Fox thus worded his interpretation of the matter; and spoke, oddly enough, at the very moment that in Edinburgh Mr. Sheridan returned to his lodgings in Abercromby Place, deep in the reminiscences of a fortunate evening at cards. In consequence, Mr. Sheridan entered the room so quietly that the young man who was employed in turning over the contents of the top bureau-drawer was taken unprepared.

But in the marauder’s nature, as far as resolution went, was little lacking. “Silence!” he ordered, and with the mandate a pistol was leveled upon the representative for the borough of Stafford. “One cry for help, and you perish like a dog. I warn you that I am a desperate man.”

“Now, even at a hazard of discourtesy, I must make bold to question your statement,” said Mr. Sheridan, “although, indeed, it is not so much the recklessness as the masculinity which I dare call into dispute.”

He continued, in his best parliamentary manner, a happy blending of reproach, omniscience and pardon. “Only two months ago,” said Mr. Sheridan, “I was so fortunate as to encounter a lady who, alike through the attractions of her person and the sprightliness of her conversation, convinced me I was on the road to fall in love after the high fashion of a popular romance. I accordingly make her a declaration. I am rejected. I besiege her with the customary artillery of sonnets, bouquets, serenades, bonbons, theater-tickets and threats of suicide. In fine, I contract the habit of proposing to Miss Ogle on every Wednesday; and so strong is my infatuation that I follow her as far into the north as Edinburgh in order to secure my eleventh rejection at half-past ten last evening.”

“I fail to understand,” remarked the burglar, “how all this prolix account of your amours can possibly concern me.”

“You are at least somewhat involved in the deplorable climax,” Mr. Sheridan returned. “For behold! at two in the morning I discover the object of my adoration and the daughter of an estimable prelate, most calumniously clad and busily employed in rumpling my supply of cravats. If ever any lover was thrust into a more ambiguous position, madam, historians have touched on his dilemma with marked reticence.”