That John Mason
by
“WHAT kind of people have you here?” I asked of one of my first acquaintances, after becoming a denizen of the pleasant little village of Moorfield.
“Very clever people, with one or two exceptions,” he replied. “I am sure you will like us very well.”
“Who are the exceptions?” I asked. “For I wish to keep all such exceptions at a distance. Being a stranger, I will, wisely, take a hint in time. It’s an easy matter to shun an acquaintanceship; but by no means so easy to break it off, after it is once formed.”
“Very truly said, Mr. Jones. And I will warn you, in time, of one man in particular. His name is John Mason. Keep clear of him, if you wish to keep out of trouble. He’s as smooth and oily as a whetstone; and, like a whetstone, abrades every thing he touches. He’s a bad man, that John Mason.”
“Who, or what is he?” I asked.
“He’s a lawyer, and one of the principal holders of property in the township. But money can’t gild him over. He’s a bad man, that John Mason, and my advice to you and to every one, is to keep clear of him. I know him like a book.”
“I’m very much obliged to you,” said I, “for your timely caution: I will take care to profit by it.”
My next acquaintance bore pretty much the same testimony, and so did the next. It was plain that John Mason was not the right kind of a man, and rather a blemish upon the village of Moorfield, notwithstanding he was one of the principal property-holders in the township.
“If it wasn’t for that John Mason,” I heard on this hand, and, “If it wasn’t for that John Mason!” I heard on the other hand, as my acquaintanceship among the people extended. Particularly bitter against him was the first individual who had whispered in my ear a friendly caution; and I hardly ever met with him, that he hadn’t something to say about that John Mason.
About six months after my arrival in Moorfield, I attended a public meeting, at which the leading men of the township were present. Most of them were strangers to me. At this meeting, I fell in company with a very pleasant man, who had several times addressed those present, and always in such a clear, forcible, and common-sense way, as to carry conviction to all but a few, who carped and quibbled at every thing he said, and in a very churlish manner. Several of those quibblers I happened to know. He represented one set of views, and they another. His had regard for the public good; theirs looked, it was plain, to sectional and private interests.
“How do you like our little town, Mr. Jones?” said this individual to me, after the meeting had adjourned, and little knots of individuals were formed here and there for conversation.
“Very well,” I replied.
“And the people?” he added.
“The people,” I answered, “appear to be about a fair sample of what are to be found everywhere. Good and bad mixed up together.”
“Yes. That, I suppose, is a fair general estimate.”
“Of course,” I added, “we find, in all communities, certain individuals, who stand out more prominent than the rest–distinguished for good or evil. This appears to be the case here, as well as elsewhere.”
“You have already discovered, then, that, even in Moorfield, there are some bad men.”
“Oh, yes. There’s that John Mason, for instance.”
The man looked a little surprised, but remarked, without any change of tone–“So, you have heard of him, have you?”
“Oh, yes.”
“As a very bad man?”
“Yes, very well. Have you ever met him?”
“No, and never wish to.”
“You’ve seen him, I presume?”
“Never. Is he here?”
The man glanced round the room, and then replied–“I don’t see him.”
“He was here, I suppose?”
“Oh, yes, and addressed the meeting several times.”
“In one of those sneering, ill-tempered answers to your remarks, no doubt.”